Planning history mapper

The authority already told you what it will accept, in the refusals

Why the planning history, on the site and around it, is your cheapest feasibility study.

Propalt Team · For property developers

Every planning authority has a track record, and it is written down. What it has approved, what it has refused and on what grounds, what was granted and then allowed to lapse. That record is the closest thing you have to the officer's opinion before you pay for one. Yet plenty of appraisals are commissioned, and architects briefed, on a site whose own planning history was never properly read.

Reading it is not just about the plot itself. The applications next door, on the same street, in the same character area, tell you the pattern the authority is working to. A scheme refused at three storeys two doors down is a strong signal about your own third storey. The history on and around a site is the cheapest feasibility work you will ever do, because it is already public and already decided.

Lapsed, refused, approved: three different messages

The three outcomes each say something specific, and mixing them up is where money gets wasted. An approval on the site sets a baseline of what is acceptable in principle. A lapsed consent is an approval that expired unbuilt, which often means the principle is fine but the numbers were not, or the market moved. A refusal, read with its reasons, tells you precisely what the authority will not wear. Together they map the space you have to work within.

The table above is illustrative. The reasons attached to a refusal are the part that earns its keep, because they name the objection you would otherwise discover after paying for drawings. Active constraint records sit alongside this history and explain many of those objections before you have to ask.

Read the history before you brief the architect

It is fair to say a planning history does not guarantee the next decision. Officers change, policy moves, and a fresh application is judged on its own merits. But an appraisal built without reading the record is guessing at the one thing that most determines whether a scheme is deliverable. The history narrows the guesswork to something a professional judgement can then refine.

Done first, this reorders the whole feasibility process. Instead of commissioning a scheme and hoping it survives, you shape the brief around what the authority has already accepted, and you flag the constraints that shaped past refusals before they shape yours. The GDV you model then rests on a scheme that has a real chance of consent.

The refusals two doors down are the officer's opinion, given for free, before you commission anything.

That is why the planning history is the first document to read on any site, not the last. It is public, it is decided, and it tells you where the deliverable scheme sits.

Read the record before you draw the scheme.

Try the Planning history mapper → · propalt.ai

Planning application history and constraint data is drawn from local planning authority records and the Propalt intelligence layer. Figures shown are illustrative. This article is general information for property development professionals.